So many of your slanders to right, where to begin?
OK most importantly: back in February, you inadvertently discovered my blog, a blog which I never meant you to see at so early a stage in the game. When I questioned your correctness in doing so, you essentially told me many times over: if you didn't want it to be read on the internet, you should not have put it on the internet. The damage being done, I had to go with that.
But I must now say out loud and in full: I did NOT use shell access on Max's machine to gain access to your precious logs. Not only would I not do so, I could not if I wanted to. I just don't know how. Any information I gathered was through intelligence sources which are still very sensitive, and which I will not reveal, but to which I can promise you that you, my opponent, have equal access. I haven't done anything you can't do.
I would also like to say that the accusations made against me, namely that I have somehow found a way to see what I wasn't meant to see (which, by the way, is what you did back in February), have not been proven in any measure by any party.
But you also raise another very troubling point in your very illuminating entry. Max, our noble judge, has, it turns out, been anything but the epitome of impartiality which he is meant to represent. He has played deception upon deception, acting, far from a mere spectator and regulator and uninterested arbiter, acting, I say, very actively to thwart and bend personal strategies on our parts for his own fetishistic amusement.
And you, Eric, wish me penalized? I have broken no rule -- and you wrote the rules! No, I think it is our noble Judge who is at the root of this trouble, for while he informed you of my secret weapon, he left it to me to discover yours on my own. The fact that I was able to do so in no way mitigates the unfairness with which I was treated, in not being informed, as were you, of my opponent's plans.
And so where are we now? Well. I'm ahead. And I intend to stay there. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go eat some meat and try, along with the savory flesh, to choke down some of the rage which you have inspired in me with your calumious ramblings.
(by the way I'm glad you still have that mirror-collage of you. it suits you).
So many of your slanders to right, where to begin?
OK most importantly: back in February, you inadvertently discovered my blog, a blog which I never meant you to see at so early a stage in the game. When I questioned your correctness in doing so, you essentially told me many times over: if you didn't want it to be read on the internet, you should not have put it on the internet. The damage being done, I had to go with that.
But I must now say out loud and in full: I did NOT use shell access on Max's machine to gain access to your precious logs. Not only would I not do so, I could not if I wanted to. I just don't know how. Any information I gathered was through intelligence sources which are still very sensitive, and which I will not reveal, but to which I can promise you that you, my opponent, have equal access. I haven't done anything you can't do.
I would also like to say that the accusations made against me, namely that I have somehow found a way to see what I wasn't meant to see (which, by the way, is what you did back in February), have not been proven in any measure by any party.
But you also raise another very troubling point in your very illuminating entry. Max, our noble judge, has, it turns out, been anything but the epitome of impartiality which he is meant to represent. He has played deception upon deception, acting, far from a mere spectator and regulator and uninterested arbiter, acting, I say, very actively to thwart and bend personal strategies on our parts for his own fetishistic amusement.
And you, Eric, wish me penalized? I have broken no rule -- and you wrote the rules! No, I think it is our noble Judge who is at the root of this trouble, for while he informed you of my secret weapon, he left it to me to discover yours on my own. The fact that I was able to do so in no way mitigates the unfairness with which I was treated, in not being informed, as were you, of my opponent's plans.
And so where are we now? Well. I'm ahead. And I intend to stay there. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go eat some meat and try, along with the savory flesh, to choke down some of the rage which you have inspired in me with your calumious ramblings.
(by the way I'm glad you still have that mirror-collage of you. it suits you).
Posted by: guy | September 8, 2004 08:54 PM