I don't trust you any farther than I could comfortably piss bleach. Why did you take the time to recategorize all your previously private logs as public? Indigestion? Please. You were willing to hospitalize yourself to win the sushi contest; indigestion is a weak excuse. Why did you ask Max, following our disclosure in september, if it would be legal for you to continue withholding?
That's your story and you're sticking to it. Jeesh. You insult us all. I'm not slowing down until I have that shiny crown atop my head and your tongue beneath my heel.
Actually, despite what you may think of my intentions, the reason I recategorized my previously private logs as public was because I, unlike you, am fully committed to following the Rules that our Learned Judge sees fit to apply to BeefStakes. In his clearly written decree as of November 30, Max demanded that "All beef consumptions must be logged in the public log." There is no reason for me to believe that this decree applies only to meat consumed in December. Nothing in his carefully crafted order would suggest that. No, he asked for all of our consumption to be logged in the public log - all consumption that is, both past, present, and future, until the end of the year. And, I might add, by failing to similarly recategorize previously entered private log entries representing over 178 lbs of meat, you have failed to abide by Max's Rules. Deliberately.
Oh, yeah. Didn't you recently mention that deliberately ignoring rules constitutes cheating? I don't know. Maybe I just read it in dictionary.com. So:
Rule 11: Verified incidence of cheating shall result in automatic forfeiture.
This seems clear enough. Remember, you helped write these rules. Then you willfullly broke them. Now you should be punished.
If I were the Judge, pissing bleach would be the least of your worries.
I don't trust you any farther than I could comfortably piss bleach. Why did you take the time to recategorize all your previously private logs as public? Indigestion? Please. You were willing to hospitalize yourself to win the sushi contest; indigestion is a weak excuse. Why did you ask Max, following our disclosure in september, if it would be legal for you to continue withholding?
That's your story and you're sticking to it. Jeesh. You insult us all. I'm not slowing down until I have that shiny crown atop my head and your tongue beneath my heel.
Posted by: guy | November 30, 2004 11:44 PM
Actually, despite what you may think of my intentions, the reason I recategorized my previously private logs as public was because I, unlike you, am fully committed to following the Rules that our Learned Judge sees fit to apply to BeefStakes. In his clearly written decree as of November 30, Max demanded that "All beef consumptions must be logged in the public log." There is no reason for me to believe that this decree applies only to meat consumed in December. Nothing in his carefully crafted order would suggest that. No, he asked for all of our consumption to be logged in the public log - all consumption that is, both past, present, and future, until the end of the year. And, I might add, by failing to similarly recategorize previously entered private log entries representing over 178 lbs of meat, you have failed to abide by Max's Rules. Deliberately.
Oh, yeah. Didn't you recently mention that deliberately ignoring rules constitutes cheating? I don't know. Maybe I just read it in dictionary.com. So:
Rule 11: Verified incidence of cheating shall result in automatic forfeiture.
This seems clear enough. Remember, you helped write these rules. Then you willfullly broke them. Now you should be punished.
If I were the Judge, pissing bleach would be the least of your worries.
Posted by: Eric | December 1, 2004 12:47 PM